Idaho Public
Utilities Commission
Case
Nos. AVU-E-10-01, AVU-G-10-01
September
21, 2010
Contact:
Gene Fadness (208) 334-0339, 890-2712
Website:
www.puc.idaho.gov
Commission adopts settlement of
Avista rate case
The
Idaho Public Utilities Commission has adopted a settlement to the Avista
Utilities electric and gas rate cases that increases electric rates an average
9.25 percent over three years and gas rates an average 2.6 percent over two
years. The first year electric increase is 3.59 percent and the first year gas
increase is 1.9 percent, both effective Oct. 1.
The
commission said the settlement “represents a reasonable compromise to the
positions and we find it in the public interest.”
“In
particular, we note the Stipulation and Settlement represents a significant
reduction in the request revenue increase.
More specifically, the first year increase in electric rates contained
in the Stipulation and Settlement is 3.59 percent rather than the 14 percent
originally proposed by Avista,” the commission said.
The
commission said it recognized “that initial disputes among the parties were
numerous and significant. This case has generated many customer comments
opposed to the rate increases originally requested by the company.”
Avista
originally requested a $32.1 million increase in annual electric revenue and a
$2.6 million increase in annual gas revenue. The settlement approved by the
commission gives the company $21.2 million spread over three years in electric
revenue and $1.85 million spread over two years in gas revenue. Helping to
offset the increase was a $17.5 million deferred state income tax benefit.
The
three-year phased rate increase effective dates are as follows:
--
Oct. 1, 2010 -- 3.6 percent electric and 1.9 percent gas.
--
Oct. 1, 2011 – 3.9 percent electric and 0.72 percent gas.
--
Oct. 1, 2012 – 1.74 percent electric and 0 percent gas.
Parties
to the case which supported the settlement included Avista, commission staff,
Idaho Forest Group, Clearwater Paper Association, the Idaho Conservation
League, the Snake River Alliance and the Community Action Partnership
Association of Idaho, the latter which represents customers on low- and
fixed-incomes. The Idaho Community Action Network did not participate in
settlement discussions, but submitted comments opposing any rate increase.
North Idaho Energy Logs also intervened in the case but did not file comments.
The
rate case settlement is the first of two rate adjustments proposed this year. The
second is the company’s annual Power Cost Adjustment, (PCA) which would
increase rates for one year an average 2.6 percent. The commission is expected
to rule on that request in the next few days.
For
a residential customer who uses the average residential consumption of 1,000
kWhs per month, the rate effective Oct. 1 would increase a bill by about $3.50
per month from $80.90 to $84.40. If the one-year PCA is approved, an average
residential bill would increase by another $1.88 per month. The customer
service charge for electric customers increases from $4.60 to $5 per month. The
gas customer service charge of $4 per month does not increase. Avista originally
requested an increase to $6.75 per month for both customer service charges.
The
adopted settlement ends a case that began last March.
The
commission is well aware of the impact of rate increases in today’s economy,
particularly on customers with low and fixed incomes. “We do agree with those
comments that Avista needs to ‘tighten its belt’ to reduce costs and improve
its efficiencies,” the commission said. Avista and other parties in the case
need to be “diligent in finding efficiencies or instances where the company’s
costs may be unreasonable,” the commission said. The phased-in rate increase
and tax credit help mitigate the impact of the increase given the current state
of the economy.
“Understandably,
most of the customers submitting comments oppose Avista’s initial double-digit
rate increase,” the commission said. While the commission does all it can to
find expense reductions and other methods to mitigate the impact of rate
increases, state law does not allow the commission to outright reject rate
increases. State statutes require that all regulated utility rate requests be
considered by the commission to determine whether the expenses the utility
seeks to recover through customer rates are needed to serve customers and if
they are prudently incurred. The commission may deny expense recovery if the
utility fails to provide evidence that adequately supports the new expenses as
needed to serve customers and prudently incurred. All commission decisions can
be appealed to the state Supreme Court by the utility, intervenors or
customers.
The
settlement increases funding for low-income weatherization from $465,000 to
$700,000 per year. The fund will permit
more low-income customers and senior citizens to weatherize their homes
resulting in lower energy bills. The settlement also provides $40,000 to
Community Action Partnership agencies for low-income outreach and education
programs about energy conservation. Avista will conduct five energy
conservation workshops for senior citizens in five Idaho communities no later
than Dec. 31, 2011.
When
Avista filed the rate case in March, it said the increases are necessary
because of escalating power supply costs, increased costs to meet new federal
requirements that ensure reliability, and the need to replace aging
infrastructure.
Power
supply contracts that provide Avista customers with about 100 average
megawatts, about 10 percent of the company’s entire retail load, expire at the
end of this year. The power provided by these contracts is about 3 cents per
kilowatt-hour, which is well below the cost to replace that power. Also included in this case were about $21
million in costs related to a power purchase agreement with the owners of the
Lancaster natural gas generating station near Rathdrum. About 80 percent of
Avista’s increase is attributable to the Lancaster agreement, termination of
the low-cost power contracts and increased customer load.
A full text of the
commission’s order, along with other documents related to this case, is
available on the commission’s Web site at www.puc.idaho.gov.
Click on “File Room” and then on “Electric Cases” and scroll down to Case
Number AVU-E-10-01 or AVU-G-10-01.
Interested parties may petition the
commission for reconsideration by no later than Oct. 12. Petitions for
reconsideration must set forth specifically why the petitioner contends that
the order is unreasonable, unlawful or erroneous. Petitions should include a
statement of the nature and quantity of evidence the petitioner will offer if
reconsideration is granted.
Petitions
can be delivered to the commission at 472 W. Washington St. in Boise, mailed to
P.O. Box 83720, Boise, ID, 83720-0074, or faxed to 208-334-3762.